piroman683
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Mike
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Threads
- 9
- Messages
- 427
- Reaction score
- 462
- Location
- Long Beach
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 Gladiator
I'm running the IBP in the front for a multitude of reasons. the 3.0 has the same piston diameter as a 2.5DSC or 2.5 coilover - but it is valved much stiffer so outside the bypass zones it performs much better. Coilover requires a lot more money and fab on the vehicle which I am trying to avoid where possible. a 3.0 external bypass for the front needs a custom tube layout, and because of how it is designed your travel length is less since the piston cannot compress past the upper shock body cap. Fox's 2.5DSC and 3.0 IBP's don't suffer from this design constraint so you end up with more piston travel in a similar sized shock body housing. This has advantages because you can have great wheel travel without needing a crazy amount of lift. There's a lot of details I have not mentioned, but hope to provide later. (comparing ext./compressed/travel lengths of each style for example)Just read through this whole thread. For those of you running the 3.0 IBP is there any reason you chose that shock over an external bypass or a coilover? I could see why some wouldn't want a coilover in the rear if they change weight often but you could do a c/o in front and a 3.0 three tube in the rear.
I'm running 3.0 external bypasses on the rear, these have larger pistons than the 2.5 DSC, 3.0IBP, and 2.5in coilover, and it has the cooling circuit. All this allows for faster desert speeds which is what I do. (not a big rock crawling guy).
Sponsored