ShadowsPapa
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bill
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2019
- Threads
- 247
- Messages
- 40,456
- Reaction score
- 53,901
- Location
- Runnells, Iowa
- Vehicle(s)
- '25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
- Occupation
- Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
- Vehicle Showcase
- 3
Cam profile and timing also matters. Change cam timing and you can shift the torque either up or down the RPM range.I could be wrong, I often am,
but I think the low end torque
comes from the longer stroke
that most push rod engines had.
Not from placement of camshafts.
The newer OHC engines
are typically short stroked
and high revving.
An old hot rodder trick
was to build a stroker motor
with longer crank arms
longer connecting rods
and shorter pistons.
This increased displacement
without boring out the cylinders
and improved grunt off the line.
To get HP out of a small displacement requires RPM. And for that, OHC is better. But you also run into profile issues with the engine. The top end becomes large and doesn't fit well into some cars.
I put a different cam in my 4.0 and increased torque even more, but you lose some top end.
Cam profile, duration, lift, timing - doesn't matter WHERE the cam is.
But a cam-in-block engine has a lot more mass to deal with. More parts to get moving and then to stop their movement or control it. You shove up a heavy lifter, pushrod, and shove a valve open, there's some mass moving and you can get the valves to "float". Doesn't happen so much with an OHC system - extremely low mass. The cam operates on a follower or fulcrum and pushes the valve open directly. There's very little mass to deal with. You can run a lot lighter valve springs with OHC vs. cam in block/push rod types. To get the higher RPM for higher HP in a cam in block engine, you have to run some heavier valve springs. That's increased wear and friction right there.
Sponsored