LongTimeListener
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I overland quite a bit in my JKUR. A buddy of mine has a modified 4Runner and he has never had to skip anything the Jeeps have done, including the Maze District of Utah. Articulation is definitely worse on the 4Runner. He'll have a tire in the air more often than the rest of us. But I have been very impressed with his rig, and wouldn't hesitate to buy one for overlanding if it was something I wanted. You'd definitely prefer a Jeep for serious rock crawling, but if you're rock crawling, a Gladiator is a bad choice too due to the breakover angle.That was a good read. I was hoping for a bit of off road testing though.
was his 4runner modded pretty heavily? Tires, lifts, bumpers, etc? I know one thing that deterred me from a 4runner was talking to some overland companies and they said it was more difficult and much more costly to mod one compared to any jeep anything.I overland quite a bit in my JKUR. A buddy of mine has a modified 4Runner and he has never had to skip anything the Jeeps have done, including the Maze District of Utah. Articulation is definitely worse on the 4Runner. He'll have a tire in the air more often than the rest of us. But I have been very impressed with his rig, and wouldn't hesitate to buy one for overlanding if it was something I wanted. You'd definitely prefer a Jeep for serious rock crawling, but if you're rock crawling, a Gladiator is a bad choice too due to the breakover angle.
Yes, it was pretty heavily modified and yes, it was expensive. Terrific result, though. One thing 4Runners really have going for them, as overlanding rigs, is a MUCH larger and more usable cargo area. It's almost laughable how compromised my JK looked next to his 4Runner.was his 4runner modded pretty heavily? Tires, lifts, bumpers, etc? I know one thing that deterred me from a 4runner was talking to some overland companies and they said it was more difficult and much more costly to mod one compared to any jeep anything.
My wife also has a 2016 4Runner, but other than for commuting (because I won't let her put that many miles on it) or 3rd row seating needs, she drives the Gladiator more than the 4Runner. Their comparison was fair. There isn't anything on the market right now that I would trade my Gladiator for.Well I guess I don't have to choose the wife has a '16 4Runner which we both absolutely love and I'm just waiting on my Gladiator to get built and delivered. For long drives the 4Runner is a great rig. The seats and ride quality are much better than the '16 Tacoma we traded in for it. It's hard to compare our 2 door JK to the 4Runner so the new Gladiator will be a better comparison when it arrives. When the 4Runner does die we are going to get another one. I've never liked a car so much that I decided it was going to be a permanent marquee in the garage through different generations. You're right about the interior space. Drop $600 at Costco and it will all fit.
the thing that gets me is the new 2020 is supposed to have a bunch of upgrades like with all the safety stuff, but they evidently aren't doing blind spot monitoring. Plus the price is going up. So you are telling me its comparable to my rubi that is loaded with all the safety stuff price wise?My wife also has a 2016 4Runner, but other than for commuting (because I won't let her put that many miles on it) or 3rd row seating needs, she drives the Gladiator more than the 4Runner. Their comparison was fair. There isn't anything on the market right now that I would trade my Gladiator for.
I bet a 4runner lifted 2-3" on 33's has as almost as much clearance to the chassis as a JLU with a 2" lift and 35"s. Jeep bellies hang low, and the geometry of the prado chassis is pretty darn good. IFS is fine for the vast majority of the globe. The FJ Cruiser was great from a size standpoint. That said, I have no idea how a 4runner and gladiator end up in a comparison test with one another. makes zero sense to me.I had a 2018 TRD Pro, wasn't my favorite vehicle. Many say they like the space, I thought it was too big, especially for the east coast. Power was mediocre, but it worked. To put 35" tires it would take a kit that is costly. Reliability, it is great but has a few issues with the wiring loom made out of soy product and attracting mice. Read up on it, plus a few other minor issues that are easily fixed. A couple of other things that I didn't like, the interior. It felt cheap and I felt like I was in a shoe box. Awesome vehicle in many ways, but not for me. Last thing, no front locker and independent suspension.
I switched to a Power Wagon, loved that truck. But, it drank too much and it was a massive truck. Never wheeled it, but I did long trips and enjoyed being in it. I also purchased it for a tow vehicle for a boat, about 7mpg all day long... I have a 2004 Dodge dually quad cab 5.9 with manual, that will be my tow vehicle from now on.
Transitioned to a Gladiator Rubicon. I wasn't too thrilled at first. But it is growing on me. Stuck some 35" tires on it, no lift required. Snowed a few weeks ago, 26". Went up a mountain road and had a blast. The GR had no issues, but it wasn't a cake walk. I had to use lockers a couple of times, but I tend to shy from lockers in snow/ice. The rear kicked out a lot, but when it was needed... it was needed.
Power on the GR was poor compared to the 6.4 PW, but I have become accustomed. I like it with the auto tranny and manual shift capabilty. Very nice ride now. I wouldn't tow with it. It is comfortable, mid-sized, has a decent turning radius and has low center of gravity. Rear departure angle is a bit weak, but it is a truck. Break over angle is also weak, the long wheel base is the issue. But you can do a minimal lift and stick 37" and improve both.
With today's technology comes nanny controls. Personally, I can't stand them. I do a lot of roading and also teach to specific military organizations (I am retired military). The 4runner had more nanny controls and is more difficult to by-pass them. The Gladiator has a few I dislike; Park brake sense, traction control, ESS and the anti-lock brakes when off roading.
I am using a jl mini, it works, but still want to get rid of park brake sense.
As far the anti-lock brake, I was in the snow and got hung up. Applied the brake, but the tires kept rotating due to the anti-lock brake. I was high centered and every time I applied brake after using gas to work myself out, the anti-lock brake would activate and the tires would keep spinning.
Space, there is not a lot. But I am ok with that. I don't want a lot of space and I would rather have a slightly smaller vehicle for the east coast tight woods.
The bed is small, but it is a bed. I do like the SUV of the 4runner especially when traveling, but I would rather have a bed over all. The PW was huge and plenty of space.
Modifications. Much easier on the Gladiator and MOPAR actually supports the mods by offering kits. $runner, exactly.... cost a ton, but well worth the effort. Still ends being an independent front suspension.
Over all, I like the Gladiator. It has a lot of potential. It will be a while before I truly off road in it. I also have a 2006 LJ Rubicon which is my primary off road buggy.
I am glad I purchased the Gladiator, but it did take some time to grow into it.
I bet a 4runner lifted 2-3" on 33's has as almost as much clearance to the chassis as a JLU with a 2" lift and 35"s. Jeep bellies hang low, and the geometry of the prado chassis is pretty darn good. IFS is fine for the vast majority of the globe. The FJ Cruiser was great from a size standpoint. That said, I have no idea how a 4runner and gladiator end up in a comparison test with one another. makes zero sense to me.
imo you should have just imported an old 76 or 79 series land cruiser. It's about the only thing that sounds like it meets all of your requirements.