ShadowsPapa
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bill
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2019
- Threads
- 247
- Messages
- 40,514
- Reaction score
- 54,050
- Location
- Runnells, Iowa
- Vehicle(s)
- '25 JTMX, '23 JLU 4xe, '82 SX4, '73 Javelin
- Occupation
- Retired auto mechanic, frmr gov't ntwrk security admin
- Vehicle Showcase
- 3
Do you know of any living outside of AZ? Seriously, the atmosphere, the 5"/hour rains, the heavy snows and ice and having to maintain a dish are just some of the things that soured me.Nothing you know about the old system applies to the new one. That's why Starlink is such a game-changer; terrestrial quality of service but anywhere. My friends who have it are 100% satisfied.
According to cnet it's 99/month (plus 500 for equipment). I guess cell stays in our home for a while yet.
I figured bandwidth might be better - I knew that latency couldn't possibly be better, but the cost is pretty up there.
From their own mouths - this still bugs me -
What about bad weather and other obstructions?
"We recommend installing Starlink in a location that avoids snow build-up and other obstructions from blocking the field of view," the FAQ reads. "Heavy rain or wind can also affect your satellite internet connection, potentially leading to slower speeds or a rare outage."
Sponsored
Last edited: