869 KPH
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I'm at a crossroads on the EcoDiesel with regards to 4A. Are there any indications this could ever happen? I think the current restriction is that there's just too much torque for the transfer case to handle?
4A isn't something that I need, but I would have an opportunity to use it a lot. I feel like road conditions around here rise to the level of 4A pretty often, but 4Hi maybe only once or twice a year. So it kind of feels foolish to get a Gladiator without 4A. Which puts me back in the pentastar camp. There are other reasons I'm on the fence for the EcoD (emissions/repair costs, unexpected limp mode, unexpected regen, ...), but I think 4A may be the final nail in the coffin.
Unlesssss someone can convince me that occasionally engaging 4Hi in winter conditions on pavement where traction can change a lot in a short amount of space isn't a bad idea.
4A isn't something that I need, but I would have an opportunity to use it a lot. I feel like road conditions around here rise to the level of 4A pretty often, but 4Hi maybe only once or twice a year. So it kind of feels foolish to get a Gladiator without 4A. Which puts me back in the pentastar camp. There are other reasons I'm on the fence for the EcoD (emissions/repair costs, unexpected limp mode, unexpected regen, ...), but I think 4A may be the final nail in the coffin.
Unlesssss someone can convince me that occasionally engaging 4Hi in winter conditions on pavement where traction can change a lot in a short amount of space isn't a bad idea.
Sponsored