rharr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2021
- Threads
- 29
- Messages
- 2,025
- Reaction score
- 2,772
- Location
- Tucson, AZ
- Vehicle(s)
- 21 JTRD 3" RKK lift, (former) 95 XJ 5sp 8" lift
Mehh, the differences between the 2 are marginal at best. The floating piston on the falcon is a little nicer with the low friction band to keep the piston rocking, but the plastic fox piston probably do the same when the plastic part contacts the cylinder, but the plastic won't score the harder aluminum so a wash. The bigger body and shaft of the falcon is also a little better, but not so important if you aren't beating on stuff. The bigger shaft causes the body to get bigger to replace the amount of oil displaced by the bigger shaft.I won't doubt your comments relative to the base terraflex stuff (springs, shocks, control arms with johnny joints, etc.).
But Falcons might be a different story. Here's a vid on a tear-down comparison of Fox 2.0 remote reservoir adjustable, and Falcon 3.3 adjustables at pretty much the same price point. Looks like they compare at or better than Fox 2.0. Since you've been inside your 2.5's you might offer how that would compare.
... and yes... the guy is an overloader...so I will add grains of salt.
Piston port design is nothing really, both are likely matched to valve shim stack.
If either want to stand out, they should add rebound adjustment and High speed/low speed adjustment and hard anodize/kashima coat the inside of the shock body or at least advertise it, roost guards and replace the chrome shafts with nitrobrite shafts.
Everything there is designed for a certain price point, plain and simple.
Sponsored