Wolf Island Diver
Well-Known Member
You’re absolutely correct. I’ve sort of avoided addressing this scenario in part because wireless signal interference is less likely in the boonies. However, paradoxically that’s also when you’re more likely to be around other people using a wireless winch. I proved that the signal could be duplicated and it doesn’t use a rolling code, but it could still be unique to each winch which would be good. I sort of doubt that’s the case though. This could possibly mean that another Jeep could actuate your winch with their remote while your’s is in use.My concern wasn’t the ability to disable the receiver. As everyone has said, it’s disabled if there is no power to the winch with a disconnect. M issue is possible malfunctions while it’s enabled, meaning it’s actively in use. If it malfunctions while I’m winching up a steep grade, disabling the receiver wouldn’t have helped.
Edit: another failure modality is that to wireless receiver fails on in the winch with no wireless signal present. The remote already fails this way so it not unreasonable to be concerned about the receiver.
If Warn knows that this is a possibility then the whole winch should be recalled. What concerns me is all the little assumptions engineers make about how people use things. Maybe they assume the user of an EVO is less likely to out at some event where multiple people are using winches simultaneously. I wouldn’t put it past them. I’m going to call Warn and talk to them about this rather than guessing what might happen.
Sponsored