@californiajeeping
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2020
- Threads
- 16
- Messages
- 922
- Reaction score
- 933
- Location
- California
- Vehicle(s)
- 2022 Jeep Gladiator diesel, 1977 cj5 LS swapped
- Thread starter
- #1
In the video above it is clear why the cp4.2 is an inferior design to the cp3.
The ramp rate on the shaft/cam is radical and the friction is very high. Remember its not lubricated by oil but by diesel. This is why additives are so important. I have been running 2oz of hot shots EDT and I frequently fill with renewable diesel all with hopes to stave off the eventual nuclear destruction of the fuel pump.
The CP3 has a much much much better design with more surface area for wear and higher flow volume. It does not have the metal to metal ramp that causes wear on the cp4. There is no roller bearing either. If the ramp rate was lower on the cam for the fuel pump lifters they could have run a flat lifter with no bearing which is likely how it was designed. At some point Bosch likely needed higher pressure so they added a ramp and then a roller to the lifter to reduce friction. This is speculative.
If we get a CP4 recall will the fix from Bosch be to retrofit to a cp3 or will they simply find a way to pin or hold the cp4 lifters from rotating 90 degrees? In all honesty that would not be a bad fix. Replace the pump with a new one with 2 plastic keepers and a flat spot on pump lifters. Similar to how some v8 engines have a plastic keeper on a lifter to keep it from rotating. Thats all the pumps need to not explode.
Sponsored