Wolf Island Diver
Well-Known Member
As cool as that thing is, an MX-5 presents a radically better money-to-fun ratio.“dude you could have bought a C8 Corvette.”
Well said!![]()
Sponsored
As cool as that thing is, an MX-5 presents a radically better money-to-fun ratio.“dude you could have bought a C8 Corvette.”
Well said!![]()
Even over on bronco6g.com (where i spent a lot of time before giving up on my perpetually delayed reservation) the prevailing sentiment if that the Jeep interior is higher quality.I think my neighbor's Bronco interior is nicer than my Gladiator interior. Sasquatch package on the Bronco and High Altitude package on my Gladiator.
My girlfriend, who drives my Gladiator very often, said "let's get a Bronco!" after looking at the interior.
also available with a proper transmissionAs cool as that thing is, an MX-5 presents a radically better money-to-fun ratio.
The GTI is still my all time favorite commuter. Super fun to drive, and the hatchback with the seats down can carry a surprising amount of stuff. Plus they are cheap enough to not care about beating the crap out of them.This report just solidifies my plan of keeping the gladiator for the weekend and getting something small to drive for my commute thinking a m57 335i… time to start saving miles on the gladiator!
I disagree the materials are better.The sea of cheap plastic? The wobbly grab handles? The lack of mid vehicle speakers? The travesty that is the tops? I have the exact opposite impression, once I look past the big screen and attractive industrial design. The Jeep is maybe a bit boring but it’s tidy, functional and the materials are better. The whole Bronco seems like a meeting of very talented industrial designers and very untalented engineers, or more likely engineers that were constrained by a target margin.
I'm browsing this forum now. Not really finding what you're saying. Do you have any links?Even over on bronco6g.com (where i spent a lot of time before giving up on my perpetually delayed reservation) the prevailing sentiment if that the Jeep interior is higher quality.
I'm not saying you and your girlfriend are wrong, just that your opinions don't line up with the masses. The bronco has a better infotainment screen than the MY18-23 JLs and JTs, but other than that one factor, it looks rather plastic-y to me.
I had a GLI before this, same theme but less space!The GTI is still my all time favorite commuter. Super fun to drive, and the hatchback with the seats down can carry a surprising amount of stuff. Plus they are cheap enough to not care about beating the crap out of them.
What about seat comfort, window switches, and sun visors?I have a 2022 Gladiator Rubicon & a 2023 Bronco Outer Banks, both have cloth interiors.
The Bronco has several advantages, the interior is not one of them. Digital RPM’s on the instrument cluster is abysmal, infotainment screen & stereo are much better on the Jeep. Manual transfer case & parking brake are much appreciated. Makes me feels like I’m not in some cookie cutter vehicle. Just my opinion. Bronco feels more generic inside.
I ordered my mojave in March of 22 and pretty much abandoned the forums at that point. Not anything I am going to have easy access to. It was the 6g community that made me even take a second look at the gladiator.I'm browsing this forum now. Not really finding what you're saying. Do you have any links?
I’ve found the leather in my Fords to be pretty decent quality, initially. In Jeeps they tend to get looser more quickly. But honestly Mazda is the only brand I’ve had where leather didn’t eventually turn to shit. The BMW X5 cracked and fell apart, but so did the rest of the pos. My Ford seats eventually wore and collapsed partially. The Infiniti developed fine lines. I don’t really expect the leather to last in any car. So far my Gladiator is about on par with the Fords I’ve owned. I don’t find the bottom of the seat to be very comfortable on the Jeep.I disagree the materials are better.
I have 40k on my Gladiator and 60k on an F150. The leather in the Jeep looks stretched out, the Ford leather looks perfect. I can take pics later if you'd like to see what I am referring to.
I'm browsing this forum now. Not really finding what you're saying. Do you have any links?
People in these threads seem to prefer the Bronco interior:
https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/what-made-you-choose-bronco-over-jeep-wrangler.78288/
https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/i-made-the-switch-jeep-to-bronco.69510/
https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/100-000-jeep-wrangler-build-quality.78362/
The 28 page thread linked below and titled "I (you) wish the Bronco came with...?" has very few mentions of the interior. Lighting mentioned 4x, softer materials 2x, and scratch resistant interior panels mentioned a few times.
https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/i-you-wish-the-bronco-came-with….77394/
You have good points.I’ve found the leather in my Fords to be pretty decent quality, initially. In Jeeps they tend to get looser more quickly. But honestly Mazda is the only brand I’ve had where leather didn’t eventually turn to shit. The BMW X5 cracked and fell apart, but so did the rest of the pos. My Ford seats eventually wore and collapsed partially. The Infiniti developed fine lines. I don’t really expect the leather to last in any car. So far my Gladiator is about on par with the Fords I’ve owned. I don’t find the bottom of the seat to be very comfortable on the Jeep.
But I was talking about the dash, door and console plastics in the Ford being more cheap feeling than the Jeep not the leather. Also, I was talking about the Bronco not the F-150. Ford spent over a billion on the new Mustang. There’s a documentary on their obsessive attention to detail on that redesign. I’m not saying Ford makes bad vehicles. F-150 owners are loyal and they keep refining that truck. The F-150 and Mustang are like the 911 and the Wrangler. There’s this built in expectation and there’s this long standing iterative design and engineering work. There’s an established demanding customer base. It constrains what goofy things Ford or Porsche or Jeep can do. The Bronco isn’t the same thing. It was 2 parts novel design, which always brings about issues. That’s not an indictment of Ford. New designs have problems. But it was also 1 part digging into the parts bin and slapping something together. Ford’s been doing that since the 1940s. Ford has always had this tendency to substitute parts on vehicles or build out new designs as parts bin builds. The original Mustang was an example. The Taurus was a notable exception. Having owned and worked on Fords my whole life, there’s evidence of this approach all over the Bronco. Some Bronco owners have found that their wheels don’t match. They didn’t take the time to properly package the engine for the platform, hence the alternator location. There’s just a myriad of problem that speak to this slapdash rollout that would never have happened on the F-150. It’s just a reality of almost every auto maker. They have their some popular vehicles that get a lot of care and attention. Then they will make something new that seems like it was slapped together as an afterthought. Maybe the Broncos popularity will incentivize Ford to refine it on the next iteration. It’s the problem of buying a new vehicle. You’re buying an experiment and makers want to spend the least amount they can on something that might not take off. The saving grace of the Gladiator is that half of the vehicle is basically a JL Wrangler.