BourbonRunner
Well-Known Member
Stellantis wouldn't have any trouble selling gas guzzlers if it offered fuel efficient models to offset those sales with. This is how Toyota, Honda, Ford, GM, Hyundai-Kia, VW, and other automakers do it.
But Stellantis killed all its affordable and efficient models, so it is now stuck with a bunch of high-priced, inefficient vehicles.
I don't think you're entirely wrong but I do think you're conflating things.No. STLA allows greed to dictate its product strategy.
Because affordable, efficient models net them lower gross margins, they get rid of them.
It is well known STLA used the USDM's high profit sales to fund its activities elsewhere and keep the balance sheets looking better since the rest of the ship was listing heavily.
Both PSA and Fiat have a boatload of fuel efficient motors in the ROW. But getting them federalized would have cost more money than they were willing to invest in the USDM because the profits here would get knackered.
My suspicion is that is why Alfa and Fiat were never really given any effort after Sergio died. On those they could have been incredibly competitive.
Something from your other post:
The various diesel emissions scandals were entirely the result of the bureacracy's loopholes in the regs. Not saying VW, FCA were ethical or absolved from sin. The EPA's guidelines were for at idle emissions, not at speed/underway. Chicken and egg perhaps?
Sponsored