ItsmeMrWright
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Hello all,
I was recently reading another poster's thread about a new air intake system and noted that the installation reduced the maximum water crossing depth by several inches. That got me to thinking. I have yet to encounter any crossings deeper than 12" in my 2025 Nighthawk with the stock 275/55R-20's, but would guess that in semi-still crossings 24" would not be much of an issue. Obviously, the speed of any current would figure on reducing that, based on the width of the crossing, but I am not the kind of driver to go full throttle across said water, rather slow and steady and not create much additional turbulence is my style.
Downstairs neightbors have those Toyota overlanders with snorkles and they can obviously go deeper. But the reality is I do not expect to ever encounter such depths around So Cal.
Peace.
SMW
I was recently reading another poster's thread about a new air intake system and noted that the installation reduced the maximum water crossing depth by several inches. That got me to thinking. I have yet to encounter any crossings deeper than 12" in my 2025 Nighthawk with the stock 275/55R-20's, but would guess that in semi-still crossings 24" would not be much of an issue. Obviously, the speed of any current would figure on reducing that, based on the width of the crossing, but I am not the kind of driver to go full throttle across said water, rather slow and steady and not create much additional turbulence is my style.
Downstairs neightbors have those Toyota overlanders with snorkles and they can obviously go deeper. But the reality is I do not expect to ever encounter such depths around So Cal.
Peace.
SMW
Sponsored