chorky
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Chad
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2022
- Threads
- 175
- Messages
- 3,466
- Reaction score
- 3,801
- Location
- Montana
- Website
- www.youtube.com
- Vehicle(s)
- '22JTR, '06 LJ, '06 TJ GE
- Build Thread
- Link
- Occupation
- GIS Specialist
I dont know that I fully agree with that. During our civil war people were willing to loose their lives over what they considered right. Many people lost husbands, children.... That was a bit different than any war outside our country. Loosing your life is a pretty darn big risk to take. Not many people are willing to risk that much today despite the good or bad that it means to their future generations. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. But change can happen if a population of people are willing to take the risk and make it happen. But that goes back to my original statement. Nobody has the guts to do it.There's too much at risk for most. They don't wanna risk what little they have. Especially when there are a good chunk of older generations who got the American dream and aren't gonna be cool will anyone trying to mess that up. It was easy to be a revolutionary a few decades ago. Anonymity was only a ski mask away. Now you breath the wrong way and you on a watch list somewhere. Attempt to act on it and you'll branded a terrorist and put down before you could enact any real change. I'm pretty sure it takes a lot more than 3% of a population to force hands in the modern world. A lot of Americans can't afford to bite the hand that feeds, even if its poison. I wouldn't say its hopeless but we stuck playing the long game and we already got the shortest stick.
Sponsored