PuddleJumper
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Cortlund
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2024
- Threads
- 68
- Messages
- 2,540
- Reaction score
- 3,373
- Location
- Alexandria, Virginia
- Vehicle(s)
- 23' JTM, 22' JTR, 22' F56S,
- Build Thread
- Link
- Occupation
- STACK Infrastructure Critical Operations Technician
- Vehicle Showcase
- 1
ok, color me confused. OP asked axle weight rating, so idk what a colorado has to do with this. Also forums saying its ring size but then contradicting themselves with a different true size makes me doubt everything. 215mm or 8.5" isnt 220mm, so what stretch was made by Scott to line that up? not trying to be rude but this seems like "hey these numbers are close, so thats how it is". If you look at the official Dana Spicer doc (i'm pretty sure its attached somewhere above), they state how to properly read their code stamping and naming scheme. 8.5" being in the ball park of 220mm just seem like coincidence, unless Dana somehow makes ring gear size match capacity in a weird way. And yes I'm aware that a stand alone axle doesn't equate to a trucks payload or tires capacity. Anyway my take away is, Dana says M220 means a 22,000lb capacity and M axle family. So Scott with a Bronco (eww) didn't fully read that spicer catalog he's referencing.It's not weight - as that will vary greatly with the vehicle it's under. You can have a Dana 44 220 under a chevy with heavier weight ratings.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Sponsored