earthemigrant
Member
- First Name
- Shawn
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2025
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 22
- Reaction score
- 38
- Location
- Modesto, CA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2021 Jeep Gladiator Rubicon EcoDiesel
- Occupation
- Production Sound & Lighting Engineer
- Thread starter
- #1
Good people of the forum I need some help. I just installed a new set of Clayton 2.5" front Diesel and 2.5" rear springs on my diesel Gladiator Rubicon. After installation two things stood out right away.
First I have a substantial lean to the passenger side in the front. From ground to the fender seam I am 45.25 on the passenger side and 46.5 on the driver side. Its listing to starboard pretty good. The springs are seated properly top and bottom.
Second I now have a revers rake. I started out with the standard 2 or so inches of rake and now I am at over 1" of reverse rake. Doesnt make sense to me. I have a SmartCap Sport with full bins on the back which is empty and no spare. Maybe 130 lbs over the stock Rubicon weight in rear. It looks level back there otherwise and the springs are seated properly.
My first thought on the front springs were they must be side specific and I am just an idiot. Wouldn't be the first time. However I looked at the packaging and at the springs themselves and there is no indication they are side specific. Identical part numbers. So I emailed Clayton. I was clear in that I had a diesel Rubicon. They got back to me today saying that their Gladiator springs are not side specific. Neither the front nor the rear. The rep said that some gladiators just lean. ? He wasn't diesel specific so I responded to clarify that this was true with the ecodiesel also but no answer yet on that.
On the rear I am really confused. I am not heavy at all. The springs advertise that they meant to hold their lift height on a vehicle that is light to moderately loaded. I would say I am definitely lightly loaded. They are also advertised to remove about an inch of the factory rake. If that were true I should still have an inch or rake. If I was squat in the rear an inch from weight I should be level.
Can anyone help me make sense of this? Should I swap the front springs to the other side? I imagine I need to go with rear 3.5 springs to get level?
If I need new rear springs I would guess I am out of luck on returning these 2.5" rear springs to Clayton since they were installed. That is really a bummer. Part of it is on me of course for not doing my due diligence with this company and their products and a number of other things I am sure. But their whole description of what these springs would provide is not at all what I am getting. I certainly dont believe I should have over and inch of reverse rake. I am certainly hesitant to go with Clayton if I do need new springs. I don't trust what I will get from them. Are there any better options I should be looking at like Synergy?
Sorry for the wall of text. Any help is appreciated.
First I have a substantial lean to the passenger side in the front. From ground to the fender seam I am 45.25 on the passenger side and 46.5 on the driver side. Its listing to starboard pretty good. The springs are seated properly top and bottom.
Second I now have a revers rake. I started out with the standard 2 or so inches of rake and now I am at over 1" of reverse rake. Doesnt make sense to me. I have a SmartCap Sport with full bins on the back which is empty and no spare. Maybe 130 lbs over the stock Rubicon weight in rear. It looks level back there otherwise and the springs are seated properly.
My first thought on the front springs were they must be side specific and I am just an idiot. Wouldn't be the first time. However I looked at the packaging and at the springs themselves and there is no indication they are side specific. Identical part numbers. So I emailed Clayton. I was clear in that I had a diesel Rubicon. They got back to me today saying that their Gladiator springs are not side specific. Neither the front nor the rear. The rep said that some gladiators just lean. ? He wasn't diesel specific so I responded to clarify that this was true with the ecodiesel also but no answer yet on that.
On the rear I am really confused. I am not heavy at all. The springs advertise that they meant to hold their lift height on a vehicle that is light to moderately loaded. I would say I am definitely lightly loaded. They are also advertised to remove about an inch of the factory rake. If that were true I should still have an inch or rake. If I was squat in the rear an inch from weight I should be level.
Can anyone help me make sense of this? Should I swap the front springs to the other side? I imagine I need to go with rear 3.5 springs to get level?
If I need new rear springs I would guess I am out of luck on returning these 2.5" rear springs to Clayton since they were installed. That is really a bummer. Part of it is on me of course for not doing my due diligence with this company and their products and a number of other things I am sure. But their whole description of what these springs would provide is not at all what I am getting. I certainly dont believe I should have over and inch of reverse rake. I am certainly hesitant to go with Clayton if I do need new springs. I don't trust what I will get from them. Are there any better options I should be looking at like Synergy?
Sorry for the wall of text. Any help is appreciated.
Sponsored