AustyPosty
Well-Known Member
I see what you're saying, but personally If i planned a multi-day off-road trip and I got an unrepairable flat on day one, i'd be pissed to have to do the rest of the trip on 3 37s and 1 33 inch tire. especially if it was a trail like the Rubicon. At that point you'd be better off just turning around and postponing the trip...^ is exactly what I do. JLUR gets 5 tire rotations as it looks dumb if the spare doesn't match and I'm probably going to a different tire every time they need replaced. On the JT, the stock spare is still under there...and the other 4 are 37s. No, the difference in size won't matter because spider gears exist. If I had a rear LSD I'd have to make sure the spare ended up on the front, but otherwise it will work just fine to get me home/off the trail/ to a tire shop. There's a reason no truck manufacturers recommend 5 tire rotations. Most don't come with a matching wheel or tire anymore. Almost every car that still comes with a spare comes with a donut. And yet some act like a few mm more wear will make the vehicle undriveable? Even if you're super paranoid, put the spare on the passenger front and thanks to the fad it isn't even connected to the powertrain at that point. 20% more tread life vs 20% higher cost when buying tires makes it pretty obvious that you aren't gaining anything either way.
Sponsored