TheRealStreetcommander
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2023
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 211
- Reaction score
- 383
- Location
- East Coast
- Vehicle(s)
- Gladiator
- Occupation
- None of your business.
- Thread starter
- #61
Sharpsicle, Not sure what manufacturing oddities you are talking about, please be more clear.
Maybe my post 58 of this thread is what you're referencing? I would call the VVL intake lifter update a normal manufacturing running change. Also, I'm not seeing where anyone in this thread has stated the factory viscosity spec is the root cause for pentastar cam failures.
I'm waiting for knowledgeable contributors to review my findings for accuracy. I'm concerned that DAVECS1 may have simply made an honest misidentification and thought the early VVL IN lifter was an EX lifter. It was easy to snowball from there. The fact that so many senior forum contributors perpetuated that mistaken narrative for 18 pages in that thread, and then many additional threads since; that is the tragedy.
Please know that If I'm wrong in my assessment stated in post 58, I'll be rapid in my apology.
Maybe my post 58 of this thread is what you're referencing? I would call the VVL intake lifter update a normal manufacturing running change. Also, I'm not seeing where anyone in this thread has stated the factory viscosity spec is the root cause for pentastar cam failures.
I'm waiting for knowledgeable contributors to review my findings for accuracy. I'm concerned that DAVECS1 may have simply made an honest misidentification and thought the early VVL IN lifter was an EX lifter. It was easy to snowball from there. The fact that so many senior forum contributors perpetuated that mistaken narrative for 18 pages in that thread, and then many additional threads since; that is the tragedy.
Please know that If I'm wrong in my assessment stated in post 58, I'll be rapid in my apology.
Sponsored
