slodsm
Well-Known Member
This is the method of engagement Honda used for DECADES on their original vtec engines wirh no failures. Solenoid at the end of the head, RPM activates the solenoid and it feeds oil pressure to the pin which locks the high lift lobes.If you guys look into the Variable Valve Lift system on these PUG 3.6 engines (2018 and newer) and look at its design and use, you’ll see why these could be having so many cam and lifter failures. At least, this is my take on it. Mind you I’ve probably done more research and study on this than the average Joe.
Almost every camshaft/lifter failure I have seen on these newer engines post 2018 is the center lobe (high lift) and not the two outer lobes (low lift). The two smaller outer lobes of the cam shaft are what are used 80 percent of the time the engine is running. Most of the damages on these newer engines are the big center lobe/high lift lobe.
The high lift side doesn’t use a traditional roller/rocker. It uses a pin and its engagement is a very abrupt event. Ironically, when I developed tuning on these I actually discovered that “high lift” mode isn’t even used for high power and that high lift is used more like a way to add airflow for emissions purposes at lower load. Think of the engagement points as being very similar to when Eco/MDS/V4 mode kicks in on the hemis and GM V8 engines. The people who have been saying for years high lift kicks in over 2800 RPM are straight up wrong.
I made a whole video about this debacle, and I am confident this hi lift system is partially causing premature cam wear, in addition to less than quality materials.
This abrupt engagement can actually be felt if you feel for it closely while driving. It comes off as a misfire or stutter feeling. Usually around 1800-2200 RPM at lower load and slower acceleration. It can be felt at highway speeds too.
I’ve got a few threads on the JL forum that cover this and a few YouTube videos floating around too. The only fix at this time is having high lift VVL tuned out, which I do. But I can’t help but wonder if disabling the high lift side will help alleviate these failures.
You’ll probably never see a formal fix from Jeep in the USA for this because it will effect emissions and they won’t jump through the hoops for that.
It’s not the type of engagement that’s an issue, it’s got to be something else because those engines routinely went 350k with people driving them that didn’t exactly do maintenance.
Not doubting your experience at all, just sharing mine. I worked on those Hondas for many many years.
Sponsored
