Good point. My JK had a 2 1/2 lift, 35s and it was a massive undertaking putting a kayak on the roof alone.Here's my 2-cents;
On my JK I went the path of lifting and 35s. On my Gladiator I'm staying stock with my Rubicon.
Personally I don't think the effort, cost, and hassle is worth it - and why I'm not going that route again. For the type of off-roading I do 35s vs 33s doesn't make a bit of difference. What does make a HUGE difference is road manners.
No matter how nice of a kit you get, big tires are big tires, and lifted Jeeps have a higher center of gravity. Unless you're really going for intense off-road stuff, I simply don't think it's worth the compromised road manners, more limited selection of shops willing (or knowledgeable) to work on things, or the warranty hassles (and uncertainty) that comes with it all.
Don't forget too, bigger tires cost more, and you'll wear through your brake pads faster.
Just my 2-cents.
Ha, part of me worries about building a frankenbeast. I loved my old JK on 35s, lift etc but after a few months of it being a daily the small things sunk in. Annoying to get kids in and out, Have to lift dog into car. Putting the Kayak on the roof was the worst.I'm dealing with this choice now. I got the mopar 2 inch lift to accomodate larger tires. My original plan was 37s. I'm currently on the stock 33s Wildpeaks.
My choices. 35s vs 37s. Going to 35s seems like a waste of money for a couple of inches. But my wife is already having issues getting into the jeep now. Not to mention my dogs.
To please everyone else ... I should just keep the 33's for now. To please ME .... I want to go with the 37's.
Decisions.
The only justifiable reason to increase tire size is needing more ground clearance.
If you're not wheeling somewhere that requires the extra ground clearance, then taller tires are just an ego or aesthetics thing.
You lift to increase room for larger tires. You put on larger tires for ground clearance.