Dickster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2023
- Threads
- 7
- Messages
- 725
- Reaction score
- 1,391
- Location
- Hillsboro, OR
- Vehicle(s)
- 2021 gladiator rubicon, 2022 Ram 3500 6.7L
- Occupation
- Sheet metal
Amen to that!FingersD.O.G.E. guts the EPA.
Sponsored
Amen to that!FingersD.O.G.E. guts the EPA.
Sounds complex in your case. I have had zero issue thus far on 3 Diesels. Mystery over fueling is tough on the engine. Did you ever replace the whole ECU with a new one and programed it from scratch not cloned.Ram 2022 3500 S.O. my regens were down to 50mile intervals.
Things replaced. Truck up to current recalls and flashes.
Air filter.
Map sensor.
Ccv filter.
Pcv filter.
Hpfp leak test.
Injector power balance test.
Dpf replacement.
Injectors pulled and set out for testing.
Rocker arms and push rods replaced.
Hpfp leak test again.
Egr inspected
Turbo inspected
Intercooler inspected.
3 weeks of live testing and recording.
Injectors replaced.
Cam and lifters pulled and inspected.
Main bearings inspected.
Another Dpf.
I've had 3 different star case numbers and special mechanics out twice to look at my truck.
Dealership and I have figured out it must be a program issue and its causing my truck to over fuel. Like I said not much you can do.
My air filter and oil changed every 5k and fuel filters every 10k. I ran fuel and oil additives.
Sounds complex in your case. I have had zero issue thus far on 3 Diesels. Mystery over fueling is tough on the engine. Did you ever replace the whole ECU with a new one and programed it from scratch not cloned.
Someone told me while back that it was either Tesla or Freightliner had a class 8 OTR EV prototype truck capable of 500 miles @ gross weight of 80,000lbs. It was just some general tid bits and I know zero details. Where and how they got to that mileage I don’t know but it’s impressive.I wasn’t talking about not being compliant diesels. Sorry if I wasn’t clear. I was talking about it not yet being possible to replace them entirely. That’s not ready yet, but it should be. We have the technology, but choose not to use it. People like money, more than the planet for their grandchildren.
EGR was pre EPA 07. The first step in emissions in the early days of it. It would lower in cylinder temps and reduce NOx. Opening at idle or decel, later it was calibrated to open under low load/low boost conditions. EPA 07 was the introduction of DPF. EGR was still viable then as a DPF does nothing for NOx. EPA13 along came SCR’s and DEF, at least for medium and heavy duty applications, I think light duty held off a few more years. With SCR there is absolutely NO point in having EGR. The need to control NOx in engine isn’t needed, that’s the entire reason for SCR is to clean up NOx. Given the choice I’d remove EGR and maintain the SCR. I could babble forever all the drawbacks to EGR and the shit I’ve seen it do and things it’s destroyed, but suffice to say it’s junk engineering, especially now.Green Diesel Engineering had this argument with the EPA. He argued that his tune can meet emissions requirements without EGR. The EPA could only point back to the written law which says you must have EGR and EGR must operate in certain conditions.
Interestingly, the new 3.0 Duramax doesn't have EGR due to the latest generation of technology.
Someone told me while back that it was either Tesla or Freightliner had a class 8 OTR EV prototype truck capable of 500 miles @ gross weight of 80,000lbs. It was just some general tid bits and I know zero details. Where and how they got to that mileage I don’t know but it’s impressive.
I have no doubt it’s buildable to do an EV semi. But I think they’ll hold charging power required to not have those trucks dormant for 3 days while charging is lacking. I’d rather see extended range electric with generators until that improves enough.Someone told me while back that it was either Tesla or Freightliner had a class 8 OTR EV prototype truck capable of 500 miles @ gross weight of 80,000lbs. It was just some general tid bits and I know zero details. Where and how they got to that mileage I don’t know but it’s impressive.
I saw these guys running up and down I-10 hauling blocks of concrete, i assume some R&D going on.
More chance any of Epsteins clients go to jail than that.FingersD.O.G.E. guts the EPA.
The local warehouse has one of those here in Redding. Perfect application hauling "air"?
They both have EV semi's. Tesla's semi burnt to the ground earlier this year. All semi's have a gross weight of 80,000 lbs. Anything over that needs a permit. From what I read. Over half the weight of a EV semi is the battery. And it takes hours to recharge the battery.Someone told me while back that it was either Tesla or Freightliner had a class 8 OTR EV prototype truck capable of 500 miles @ gross weight of 80,000lbs. It was just some general tid bits and I know zero details. Where and how they got to that mileage I don’t know but it’s impressive.
Yeah those trucks would be relegated to paper towels or LTL freight, maybe triples for FedEx, would be worthless for any weightI couldn’t imagine one hauling equipment or any A or B train combo. I wasn’t aware the Tesla burnt down, but I don’t follow on highway stuff. My world is off highway and a small engine is 19 liters.They both have EV semi's. Tesla's semi burnt to the ground earlier this year. All semi's have a gross weight of 80,000 lbs. Anything over that needs a permit. From what I read. Over half the weight of a EV semi is the battery. And it takes hours to recharge the battery.
Or Diddy's fellow Diddlers.More chance any of Epsteins clients go to jail than that.
I think you guys need to define “emissions”… the fact that diesel makes soot tells me that the carbon is coming out solid and will just go into the soil. I’d imagine CO2 is much less because the C in CO2 is in another form. Then we need to ask is CO2 even bad??? At 350ppm it makes up about .004% of our air, whereas oxygen in 21%. I’m not sure that making plant food is really all that bad, the earth today is much greener than just a few decades ago.
Another thing to consider is, in the desert we are importing mass amounts of water. a gallon of gas emits a gallon (ish) of water in the form a vapor. In the desert this may be a blessing, in fact in the county I live we sell about 8 million gallon of retail (not commercial) gasoline PER DAY… so we are importing 8 million gallons of water per day, most goes into the atmosphere, which leads to the next point. The worst greenhouse gas is in fact water vapor, far farrrr worse than CO2.
We need real unbiased science … remember carbon monoxide, the real poison gas? Well, we fixed that, now it looks like we are trying to make a new enemy and I am not sure CO2 is it… I’d like to see real data over the course of a years operation of various vehicles to quantify what “pollutants” are generated. We focus on soot, CO2, NOX, etc what else is there.
also, they always pick on the middle class tax payer to do all the work, put DEF/DOF/SCR/EGR on a few cruise ships and tankers and I guarantee you will do FAR more emissions improvements than ALL the little vehicles we use.