CrazyCooter
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Tony
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2020
- Threads
- 11
- Messages
- 2,304
- Reaction score
- 2,557
- Location
- Far NorCal
- Website
- www.overlandvehicledynamics.com
- Vehicle(s)
- 1991 JEEP YJ, 2021 JTR Ecodiesel
- Occupation
- Specialty Off Road Shop Owner
I can agree about the measurement front to back, but what you are measurement is not accurate IF the wheel, rotor, and/or bearing hub have runout especially IF they are clocked in a manner where those tolerances are adding up?Right and I've also seen people who took a car that was mechanically sound (no bad bearings, ball joints, tires, wheels, etc.) and align a car, then park it. Another tech pulls that car in for an alignment on the same rack with the same equipment, sets it back up and says that its close but needs to be adjusted and get different results because a different person with a different experience level. It's all about understanding what you are working with and what you can expect.
Now if that tool can only measure in 1/16" increments well that is a pretty substantial limitation. If it is only accurate to 1/16" of an inch but can obtain repeatable measurements at a smaller increment than 1/16" then I really like it because I don't care what the measurement is. I care what the difference is front and back. Accuracy and precision, I care about precision here, not accuracy.
You might be better off just not touching the toe setting as you might be making it worse without knowing? If you didn't bend anything, why touch it in the first place?
Can you trust a rifle scope that not been sighted in yet? Nope! The info it's giving you is probably flawed?
Sponsored