I had a TJ that I swapped a non-HO 4.7 V8 in to. It was a fun Jeep.I would personally like just a 5.3 LS in one. That would wake up this truck so much. I also think the oldie but goodie 4.7 HO would be super nice. My Jeeping buddy and I were looking at options last weekend as I just happen to have a low mileage 4.7 HO from the WJ days laying around. We crawled all over mine looking at what we needed to repower it and leave NOTHING OEM behind. Strip it down to body only, even the dash goes away.
It’s a great engine, I mean if ya have one that can hold together anyway. My last made it just short of 300 and flew apart cruising at 45, on a ‘03…weird. I handed so many Rubicons their fancy asses on trails with that WJ. I really want to stick this one I have now into this truck. Even have the 545 and 247 to go with.I had a TJ that I swapped a non-HO 4.7 V8 in to. It was a fun Jeep.
I swapped in a 130k mile motor cause I had it. Wasn’t long after it was popping off rocker arms and dropped valve seats. So I bought a reman motor. Made it 15k miles before I accidentally ran it 30 mins with the radiator cap off and over heated it which killed it. But it ran good when it ran. ?It’s a great engine, I mean if ya have one that can hold together anyway. My last made it just short of 300 and flew apart cruising at 45, on a ‘03…weird. I handed so many Rubicons their fancy asses on trails with that WJ. I really want to stick this one I have now into this truck. Even have the 545 and 247 to go with.
Yeah we average 19-19.5 in our '19 JLUR 2.0t eTorque. Its been a great motor with more then enough grunt to keep me happy while driving an Amazon box on 37" KO2sA 5.7L hemi would be every bit as efficient as the 2.0t in the JLs and more efficient than the 3.6L. Since 2017 we've owned a 2017 ram rebel 5.7L hemi, a 2019 jlur 2.0t, a 2022 jlur with the xr package 3.6L, and a 2023 JT mojave 3.6L. The 2.0t was only slightly more efficient than the 5.7L stock for stock and the ram weighed about 1500lbs more. Adding armor, tires, and lift to the 2.0t and the efficiency dropped to 15-16mpg. The ram still got 17-18mpg after a lift and tires. The JLUR 3.6Lgets 13-14mpg as does the JTM. I would bet money that the JT would get better mileage from a 5.7L than the 2.0t as the efficiency of the 2.0 goes out the window when it's pushing boost constantly.
Sounds like a 4.7?I swapped in a 130k mile motor cause I had it. Wasn’t long after it was popping off rocker arms and dropped valve seats. So I bought a reman motor. Made it 15k miles before I accidentally ran it 30 mins with the radiator cap off and over heated it which killed it. But it ran good when it ran. ?
Right there with ya brother.Hell No!! It’s a damn shame the Tacoma, Colorado & Canyon ONLY OFFER the 4cyl. That’s it…… (gas only that is).
We’ll see what happens over the years. Either they’ll take off…… Or they’ll flop.
No offense, but I hope (in my lifetime), I’m not forced to pick an electric vehicle because that’s all they offer. ?
I’ll take a 2.8L Cummins please.It's all the rage now. Iam curious how many of us are jealous of the new Tacoma powerplant and other trucks moving to smaller displacement motors.
Not jealous at all. I'm actually wondering if they're jealous of me ?. My wife has an SUV with a turbo four and I don't like the wimpyness at the low-end (turbo lag) or the mid-range. Hybrid would help, but then you're adding complexity, which means less reliability. Hard pass for me - ThanksIt's all the rage now. Iam curious how many of us are jealous of the new Tacoma powerplant and other trucks moving to smaller displacement motors.
As a Cummins field tech, I approve this message. Way better than some off brand Italian engine. Plus where Chrysler or who ever they are this month already supports the B6.7 would make more sense to one stop shop.I’ll take a 2.8L Cummins please.
not that I mind my 3.0. But the 2.8 would offer a bit more work around room![]()