moparkido
Member
Do they have a lunch box style locker for the front yet? Im also waiting on the truetrac for the rear. Just don't want to spend the money on ARB.
Sponsored
Why do you say e locker not for rocks?
Ok first off sorry I mustāve missed these comments! Hereās where I came up with my statement, in the past the lockers would break due to one tire spins then catches good solid traction. I have never dealt with this personally because I had ARBs. But have witnessed it happening! Before I went with the arbs I was in the market for elockers and was told bu a reputable business owner. He sold me the arbs for the same cost of the elockers. I had them installed. After a few years of wheeling I witnessed this happening! Now that was a few years ago! And we had a couple guys with rubis that never had a problem..... so take it for what it is.Why do you say e locker not for rocks?
From the logic you're using, an ARB should have the same problem. Both lock the axles 100% to each other. But I get what you're saying. This is a problem to worry about with any style of traction aid, whether it be an E-lock, an Air lock, a limited slip, a lunch box locker, etc. It's just nature of the beast.Ok first off sorry I mustāve missed these comments! Hereās where I came up with my statement, in the past the lockers would break due to one tire spins then catches good solid traction. I have never dealt with this personally because I had ARBs. But have witnessed it happening! Before I went with the arbs I was in the market for elockers and was told bu a reputable business owner. He sold me the arbs for the same cost of the elockers. I had them installed. After a few years of wheeling I witnessed this happening! Now that was a few years ago! And we had a couple guys with rubis that never had a problem..... so take it for what it is.
From what I saw and was told when the elocker was engaged one side wasnāt locked all the way by design and thatās why it broke. Might be different with todayās lockers though. Itās been 10 or so years ago that Iām talking about. And like I said the Rubicon didnāt have any issues at all..From the logic you're using, an ARB should have the same problem. Both lock the axles 100% to each other. But I get what you're saying. This is a problem to worry about with any style of traction aid, whether it be an E-lock, an Air lock, a limited slip, a lunch box locker, etc. It's just nature of the beast.
Go to the Mopar site you can get the Rubicon switch for the lockers and disconnect as well.You have a link for that?
Our gladiators are 32 spline and that is what you need if you run stock axles.Was just looking on the quadratic site at the ARB lockers for M210/M220 and they have 3 spline options 29, 32 or 35. What is the difference pros/cons with each?
https://www.quadratec.com/p/arb/air...ler-jl-gladiator-jt/35-spline-m210-m220-rd246
Thanks for the infoOur gladiators are 32 spline and that is what you need if you run stock axles.
I have the arb rd245 front and rd246 rear. But running bigger dana 60 sized shafts.Has anyone installed ARBs in a JT yet? I wrote ARB and they said both axles take RD245 so thats what I ordered. Hope they work!
Ok thanks!I have the arb rd245 front and rd246 rear. But running bigger dana 60 sized shafts.
The rd245 front and rear is what you need for stock shafts.
Yes its the one for non rubicon with fad. At this time I have not seen a fad delete for the sport but dana makes an upgrade for us with fad delete for 750 dollars and chromoly shafts.Ok thanks!
Do you know is RCV makes a 32 spine axle shaft that will work with this setup? Couldn't tell on their site.