class leading 38.3" For comparison, from what I recall the Tacoma is 32.9", Ranger and Ridgeline is 34.5". Clearly the JT blows em away. I have sat in both the RL and the Ranger, with the drivers seat adjusted for me at 6'0" /32" inseam, with a slight recline, my knees touch in the Ranger and almost touch in the RL. I have 2" of room in the JL. The RL is by far the widest of the three, as to be expected as is almost as wide as a F150. The Ranger has the worst back seat functionality of the trucks as it does not fold flat, no floor space under seat when folded up, and does no 60/40 split for passengers and cargo. The Tacoma has no flat floor under the seat but will fold flat if you remove the headrest and has a nice hard plastic backing on the rear seat for cargo. The RL is has a close to flat floor with seats up but the seats use cheap brackets to lock into a floor rail. From what I have seen on videos the JT is going to be the best with an optional locker for the floor, 60/40 split, fold up for tall cargo and fold down for load cargo to he higher up. My only criticism would have been to use an inch of that rear leg room to add an inch of recline to the rear seatback. Also when sitting in the JL front passenger seat I noticed my feet were canted to the right due to the transmission tunnel and when seated in the drivers seat my left hand nearly touches the door. Boy the JL/JT probably could have used a couple more inches of width IMO.
Just get some automatic drop steps. I recommend Rock Slide Engineering. That's just my opinion
