According to Chrysler, the Mojave depreciates less but not by much.That's a fair reply IMHO.
Coming at from a different angle. Which would say is a better "value"?
Looks the same. Interesting.Sport same locations.
![]()
![]()
I have no idea what your point is.Can we let the debate rest? Get what you want, both have their upsides. I special ordered my Rubicon even after heavily test driving both and with mojaves getting extra rebates that Rubicons don't. I don't plan to rock crawl either.
But you guys have shown me the light, I need a Mojave instead. What with all broken frames and steering knuckle threads I see on here it is only a matter of time before it happens to me. Also since the majority of us run stock wheels and stock height ( unless we do the ultimate upgrade of spacers and shock extensions) it is an obvious choice to get the Mojave.....
Some people i guess didnt see that you asked if the video was accurate in the way it compared the two trims. I suppose they think you are asking them to compare the two for you. That you tube channel also has a Jeep Comanche Vs. Gladiator that im sure would upset them lol.I have no idea what your point is.
If they ever install a 392 it will be a HOMO.Actually, you answered your own question...
Both are great vehicles and can do it all,
Rubi is optomised for rock-crawling.
Mo' is optomized for faster driving over rough roads.
If you ain't going to do much rock-climbing the decision is clear.
I came into this assuming a Rubi, but when I learned about the Mo' I realized it is just a way better fit for me.
That the frame reinforcement and stronger knuckles are non-factors what with the whole lack of issues around either of those parts. Also that unless you want spacers and shock extensions the other special mojave bits are also non factors.I have no idea what your point is.
Thanks!
Mojave same locations. I think those areas are the same on all JTsMojave gets:
- Heavy duty coils front and rear
- Heavy duty unique shocks front and rear with reservoirs
- Reinforced frame from the middle section below the cab to just beyond the rear axle
- Stronger front coil towers
- Stronger front shock towers
- Stronger front anti-sway bar
- Additional skid plate under the front bumper
- Cast iron steering knuckle vs. aluminum
- Unique front upper control arms
It's quite a large improvement considering it's the same price as a Rubicon and only lacks a front locker and a 4:1 low range which 99% of people don't care about.
I just went out and checked my EcoDiesel. I will post two pictures and we'll need somebody here to look at their Sport Pentastar in these same areas of the frame and let us know if it looks the same or not.
The first picture is on the frame directly under the driver side rear door. Second picture is the frame driver side just behind the coil spring. You can see obvious welding in these areas, and it is between these two areas where the Mojave frame is reinforced. So, is my diesel frame reinforced too? Or do all JTs look like this?
![]()
![]()
Yeah so there was one thing I did miss. That the Mojave also gets a stronger rear axle than the Rubicon. That's interesting, but makes perfect sense.Mojave same locations. I think those areas are the same on all JTs![]()
![]()
This article is the best Ive seen on the Mojave differences.
https://jalopnik.com/here-are-the-hardware-changes-behind-the-2020-jeep-glad-1841519338
Rubicon, Mojave, all same axle. That's the issue with all of these articles none are 100% correctYeah so there was one thing I did miss. That the Mojave also gets a stronger rear axle than the Rubicon. That's interesting, but makes perfect sense.