TheHops
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
(Heads up--longer post, with some background, justification and number crunching.)
TL;DR, I'm switching from 35s to 37s and expect to see performance improvements across the board.
I will be making the change from Nitto Ridge Grappler, 35x12.5R17 E-load tires, to BFG KO2, 37x12.5R17 C-load tires.
I recall saying early on in my build that I had zero interest in going over 35" tires. Well, fast-forward a little over three years and here we are. So, what changed my mind?
I loved the Ridge Grapplers, and have had poor experiences with KO2s in the past, so we'll see how this goes. I had a sidewall separation on the highway with the last KO2s that I ran several years back. I'm hoping and praying that I don't experience anything like that with these tires. The price on these was right, so this is BFG's last chance to win me over.
So, the science behind the change. I actually crunched some numbers, and my findings were that the induced stress on the drivetrain will be *less* with this tire change. By running the numbers to find the resulting lever torque at each wheel, here's what I found. Size/weight specs were taken directly from manufacturers.
Force applied in order to roll must overcome static friction. Static friction is calculated by the force an object exerts (normal force) multiplied by how "sticky" the surface is (coefficient of static friction). I used a .8 constant for the "stickiness." With that in mind:
Nitto Ridge Grappler, 35x12.5R17, E-load
268.48 N static friction * .441452 m (or, 34.76 inch overall diameter divided by two--which is 17.38 inches from fulcrum to outside of tire) = lever torque of roughly 118.5 Nm to start rolling
BFG KO2, 37x12.5R17, C-load
230.56 N static friction * .46355 m (or, 36.5 inch overall diameter divided by two--which is 18.25 inches from fulcrum to outside of tire) = lever torque of roughly 101.8 Nm to start rolling
That means induced stress will be reduced by 16.7 Nm per wheel. That is significant, especially considering the fact that I will be going *up* in tire size. With a manual transmission, I may still need to regear down the road (I rarely come out of 4th gear on the highway as-is), but the reduced stress, and the reduced weight/rolling mass of each wheel, almost makes me wonder if I may see an *increase* in fuel economy. Time will tell. Regardless, the expected increase in performance due to clearance/snow rating, the expected improvement in road manners going from E to C load, and the reduced stress at the wheels/on the axles was enough for me to buy-in and make the change.
I'll be sure to drop updates on my build page (https://www.jeepgladiatorforum.com/forum/threads/ares-build-thread.26187/) for anyone that is interested.
TL;DR, I'm switching from 35s to 37s and expect to see performance improvements across the board.
I will be making the change from Nitto Ridge Grappler, 35x12.5R17 E-load tires, to BFG KO2, 37x12.5R17 C-load tires.
I recall saying early on in my build that I had zero interest in going over 35" tires. Well, fast-forward a little over three years and here we are. So, what changed my mind?
- I installed a Clayton 2.5" lift that ended up giving me over 3 inches front and rear. If I had gotten 1.5" to 2.5" of lift, as I had expected to considering the amount of weight I have added to my rig, I would have stuck with 35s. There is more than enough space for 37s in the wheel wells on my Rubicon. I have been running this lift for about 9 months now.
- I relocated from the south (TN), to up north (upstate NY), and wanted/needed to purchase snow-rated tires. Since I was going to make a purchase anyway, now was the time to do it.
- I came across a deal that I couldn't pass up.
- Science (more on this below).
I loved the Ridge Grapplers, and have had poor experiences with KO2s in the past, so we'll see how this goes. I had a sidewall separation on the highway with the last KO2s that I ran several years back. I'm hoping and praying that I don't experience anything like that with these tires. The price on these was right, so this is BFG's last chance to win me over.
So, the science behind the change. I actually crunched some numbers, and my findings were that the induced stress on the drivetrain will be *less* with this tire change. By running the numbers to find the resulting lever torque at each wheel, here's what I found. Size/weight specs were taken directly from manufacturers.
Force applied in order to roll must overcome static friction. Static friction is calculated by the force an object exerts (normal force) multiplied by how "sticky" the surface is (coefficient of static friction). I used a .8 constant for the "stickiness." With that in mind:
Nitto Ridge Grappler, 35x12.5R17, E-load
268.48 N static friction * .441452 m (or, 34.76 inch overall diameter divided by two--which is 17.38 inches from fulcrum to outside of tire) = lever torque of roughly 118.5 Nm to start rolling
BFG KO2, 37x12.5R17, C-load
230.56 N static friction * .46355 m (or, 36.5 inch overall diameter divided by two--which is 18.25 inches from fulcrum to outside of tire) = lever torque of roughly 101.8 Nm to start rolling
That means induced stress will be reduced by 16.7 Nm per wheel. That is significant, especially considering the fact that I will be going *up* in tire size. With a manual transmission, I may still need to regear down the road (I rarely come out of 4th gear on the highway as-is), but the reduced stress, and the reduced weight/rolling mass of each wheel, almost makes me wonder if I may see an *increase* in fuel economy. Time will tell. Regardless, the expected increase in performance due to clearance/snow rating, the expected improvement in road manners going from E to C load, and the reduced stress at the wheels/on the axles was enough for me to buy-in and make the change.
I'll be sure to drop updates on my build page (https://www.jeepgladiatorforum.com/forum/threads/ares-build-thread.26187/) for anyone that is interested.
Sponsored
Last edited:
