Hootbro
Well-Known Member
I think your reply sums it up pretty well. CAFE standards are not just averaging MPG across models of a given brand, but there is also a formula that factors in and gives credit for how many of particular model is sold.First, I want to say that I'm not disagreeing with you, the FAD is definitely another point of failure, and not a benefit on an individual level.
Out of curiosity, I made some assumptions and ran some rough numbers. Here we go;
Let's say the average JL/JT lifespan is 100k miles, and it averages 15.0 mpg without FAD. During this average lifespan, these jeeps will use 6,667 gallons of fuel.
Same assumptions, but with the addition of FAD, these JL/JT's get 15.1 mpg. During this average lifespan, these jeeps will use 6,622 gallons of fuel. So the FAD at 0.1 mpg saves each Jeep about 45 gallons of fuel over it's lifetime.
For the 2021 model year, Jeep produced about 300k JL/JT's. So for the 2021 model year, the addition of FAD saves 13,500,000 gallons of fuel.
If the gallon of fuel averages $3.00 over this period, that is $40,500,000 spent on something besides wasted fuel.
This isn't to argue for or against FAD, I just think the numbers are interesting!
So those tenths of a mile gain here or there add up and the automakers get credit regardless if those features are disabled, removed or not used at the end user level.
What we consider annoying or inconsequential, the auto makers have to squeeze everything they can at manufacture as built or be fined for failing to meet ever increasing CAFE requirements.
Sponsored