Barbarian
Well-Known Member
Last thing, I’m going to do a 4 wheel weight measurement sometime next week. Wouldn’t surprise me if the springs moved about 500 pounds front to rear. Which would help with the extra diesel weight
Sponsored
I don’t think you’ll find near that much difference, if any at all with limited amount of movement. I’d be interested to see if I’m wrong though.Last thing, I’m going to do a 4 wheel weight measurement sometime next week. Wouldn’t surprise me if the springs moved about 500 pounds front to rear. Which would help with the extra diesel weight
I was looking at this yesterday. The differential and UCA mount fit tightly in a cavity right below the motor. It looks like a heat exchanger hanging off the motor is right above where the pumpkin stops. Lots going on under there... Noticed some ATF ever so slightly seeping from where the trans and TC meet.... not good.Thanks for this info!
I’m absolutely not opposed to adding hydraulic or pneumatic bump stops. One thing I’ve not been able to answer yet is what is the reason the bump stop tube or shaft is longer on the diesel models? I’ll go on a limb and guess that the diesel motors have pieces parts that hang down further than the 3.6 L motor does. I don’t know exactly what the low point is but I question if it is the upper control arm mount either on the top of the differential or the one on the passenger side. Whoever installed your set up, were they able to tell you what it was and how did they determine how much of the bump stop tube to remove in order to install the hydraulic set up ?
That’s what I figured. Over the weekend I read in several posts that a fella was looking for increased upward flex…which I’d strongly recommend against. If looking for additional travel stick with increasing droop. Be very observant when dialing in bump stop increases as lift is increased. Thanks again for peaking.I was looking at this yesterday. The differential and UCA mount fit tightly in a cavity right below the motor. It looks like a heat exchanger hanging off the motor is right above where the pumpkin stops. Lots going on under there... Noticed some ATF ever so slightly seeping from where the trans and TC meet.... not good.
Apologies for my naivety, I'm in the process of learning all of this terminology. Does this have implications for a run of the mill 2.5" suspension lift kit?That’s what I figured. Over the weekend I read in several posts that a fella was looking for increased upward flex…which I’d strongly recommend against. If looking for additional travel stick with increasing droop. Be very observant when dialing in bump stop increases as lift is increased. Thanks again for peaking.
If I understand your question correctly…no it shouldn’t. It appears to be more critical on Diesel models, but even gassers will have bump stop spacers equal to that of the lift of the spring.Apologies for my naivety, I'm in the process of learning all of this terminology. Does this have implications for a run of the mill 2.5" suspension lift kit?
So increasing the compressed length of the coil (e.g., by ~2.5") should push the bump stop further away and mitigate this problem, right? And/or increasing the stiffness of the coil?If I understand your question correctly…no it shouldn’t. It appears to be more critical on Diesel models, but even gassers will have bump stop spacers equal to that of the lift of the spring.
The rear is less critical, but on diesel front ends, the tube which houses the bump stop in the center of the spring is longer limiting upward travel. This is not a horrible thing. There are things we can do with a fender flares if need be to either increase the size of the tire and or increase full stuff articulation without contact.
What ever the ‘special sauce’ is…differs from manufacturer to manufacturer. Ultimately, the axle has high points, upper control arm mounts for example, and they can only go up so far before making contact with the motor components…and tires with fenders. On the Mopar kit for example, their 2” lift has 2” bump stop extensions that mount to the spring pad on the axle side spring pad on the front axle.So increasing the compressed length of the coil (e.g., by ~2.5") should push the bump stop further away and mitigate this problem, right? And/or increasing the stiffness of the coil?
That's very helpful. Thanks.What ever the ‘special sauce’ is…differs from manufacturer to manufacturer. Ultimately, the axle has high points, upper control arm mounts for example, and they can only go up so far before making contact with the motor components…and tires with fenders. On the Mopar kit for example, their 2” lift has 2” bump stop extensions that mount to the spring pad on the axle side spring pad on the front axle.
You’re usually pretty safe following suspension system manufacturer recommendations. When folks start trying to mix and match components or install incomplete systems is where you’ll usually see issues. Most manufactures will typically give you maximum tire size recommendations for a particular lift along with wheel offset recommendations. These recommendations are based on their testing which includes articulation limits.
bump stops are used to:Apologies for my naivety, I'm in the process of learning all of this terminology. Does this have implications for a run of the mill 2.5" suspension lift kit?
These rear polyurethane spacers (e.g., Daystar, Teraflex)....any reason to suspect they'd be insufficient? I'd like to add less than 1" in the rear, so they'd be perfect (and cheap), but it just feels counterintuitive that two pieces of plastic would be able to support the forces from offroading and trailering. And frankly, I'm always expecting anything Jeep related to be over $500 ?. Consensus is they're fine? Sorry for a bit of a hijack.As I stated before I ended up installing Sumo Springs bump-stops and Tereflex 1-1/2 spacer lift in front. I also installed the Rear 3/4 in spacer to level and added the rear Sumo spring bump-stops. Everything drives the same on pavement but on dirt or any bumps it is far smoother. The Sumo springs "hit" sooner than the old bump-stops but it smooths everything out. You can't even feel it touch but I know they do because there is only 1-1/2 of space before they do.
I am very happy to get the better ride without lifting much.
Depends on your build date - was it after 2/25/22? If so you are good and got the updated shocks/bumps off the assembly line. That said, in my case, it only made it about 50% better. My Jeep went from bottoming out at 10 mph over a speed bump to 15-16 mph after the fix. I will be adding the front clayton springs they have to fix the issue and make it a little bit better. Trying to keep it stockish height for now for the wife with 35s otherwise, I would just lift it.So I haven’t seen anything lately on this thread. Is this issue happening on the 2022 JTRD? I didn’t feel like reading through 58 pages after reading through about 20.
The up date happened with the 2/17/22 and newer. Mine is 2/17/22. So I have the the up dated stuff. It still bottomed out some. I have the Clayton springs installed. They made it even better. They're a heavy spring rate and raised the front about 1". When Clayton came out with the springs, i was a Beta tester for them.So I haven’t seen anything lately on this thread. Is this issue happening on the 2022 JTRD? I didn’t feel like reading through 58 pages after reading through about 20.