Ghetto Fab.
Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2022
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 3
- Location
- A-town, California
- Vehicle(s)
- Things with 4 large wheels
Adjustable control arms and geometry correction brackets are two totally different animals really. Adjustable control arms simply allow you to get your caster and pinion angles back to where they should be, but do nothing for geometry. Geometry brackets kinda suck since they space everything down on the frame 3-4" and that typically ruins ground clearance, but it restores all the suspension geometry to where it was before the lift. From what I've seen firsthand over about 2" lift the jeeps start developing roll oversteer and thats where some form of geometry correction is beneficial. Ideally, going to a long arm suspension fixes the geometry issues without killing ground clearance.Yea I wanted the geometry brackets for the better handling since it is my daily driver. My understanding is the more parallel the front LCAs are to the frame/road the less jarring bumps are so that's why I went with them.
I do plan on getting better control arms with the Clayton kit, but will likely keep the geometry brackets along with the new control arms for the same reason. Even with keeping the brackets, the Clayton arms will give me more flex which is mainly what I am after.
I would just ditch the rear sway bar. It doesn't do much and hangs down. The way they designed it attaching to the frame it looses ground clearance as the suspension compresses. I'd imagine some of the guys that have bent or ripped the mounts off have done so by trying to drive the links into rocks as the suspension articulates and compresses. That design just doesn't work for wheeling.
Its really cool to see the Glads being used on the Rubicon! Thats one of the things they were built for! Now to just find that extra $50k somewhere, hmmm......
Kevin
Sponsored