Hootbro
Well-Known Member
My work has implemented this system in our Performance Reviews and Goals for at least the last 7-10 years or so. It is pretty much a joke among most salaried workers and only seems effective for executive level managers and 1st year new hires. Everybody else, it is just a roll your eyes gamed system that because the year end performance reviews have management rating 20% not meets, 60% meets and 20% exceeds regardless. So a manager can have 100% rockstar performers on the goals being met but 20% are going to get a shit review regardless.Specific
Measurable
Attainable
REALISTIC
Time-specific
A lot of salaried employees waste valuable work time trying to just manage their metrics for this system that really does not reflect day in and day out what they do because the goals floated down are like trying to nail Jello against the wall. Most have found to include me, just give lip service to these performance metrics and just do our jobs and so long as management does not yell at you too much during the year, you are going to get "Meets" or better on the performance review.
Between this and now DEI crap creeping in, most agree they could fire every body that manages these systems and we would be better off as most the time, they stand in the way of actual work needing to be done.
Sponsored
Last edited: