staying_tuned
Well-Known Member
The EB line has huge aftermarket hard-part and tuning support. The 2.7 is capable of 400 rwhp tune only. The 3.5 is capable of 500 rwhp tune only. It is likely safe to assume that the 3.0 will be in the middle. Any hope of Stellantis catching this on an ICE platform is pretty bleak. A tuned 3.5 with a few hard parts (warrantied by ford) runs mid 12s while the 392 runs high 12s so even if they were to scramble the 392 in the Gladiator in response, it would be too little given the ranger currently weighs 1,500 lbs less and the 392s compression isn't conducive to forced induction long term. A buddy has a 3.5 RCSB that just wont die, threw a slew of hard parts on it with a Stage 5 tune on corn. Has some 130k miles on the thing and still sends it. Beast. Like most EBs, this Ranger will likely support up to e30 off the lot and a cheap tune will take full advantage of that.
The tornado is promising but at this point I wouldn't blame the aftermarket for ignoring it and the black box nature of Stellantis ECM/PCM is a huge bottle-neck. I also wouldn't blame Jeep for not responding to this. They really have nothing in their ICE arsenal to offer which would feasibly land in at under 100k.
The ranger feels like a disposable toy though. I wouldn't buy one but cheers to ford for throwing a 3.0 TT in it. Perhaps Jeep will have a typhoon hybrid approach like Ford's powerboost but again, about 5 years late already on that. I love my Gladiator, LOVE it but boy do I wish they'd throw us some sort of option in the straight line performance department.
Stated/posted/etc. doesn't really matter because anyone buying the EB platform whose interested in performance will mail-order 100+ hp/tq via instantly. Suffice to say, don't line up with one.
The tornado is promising but at this point I wouldn't blame the aftermarket for ignoring it and the black box nature of Stellantis ECM/PCM is a huge bottle-neck. I also wouldn't blame Jeep for not responding to this. They really have nothing in their ICE arsenal to offer which would feasibly land in at under 100k.
The ranger feels like a disposable toy though. I wouldn't buy one but cheers to ford for throwing a 3.0 TT in it. Perhaps Jeep will have a typhoon hybrid approach like Ford's powerboost but again, about 5 years late already on that. I love my Gladiator, LOVE it but boy do I wish they'd throw us some sort of option in the straight line performance department.
Stated/posted/etc. doesn't really matter because anyone buying the EB platform whose interested in performance will mail-order 100+ hp/tq via instantly. Suffice to say, don't line up with one.
Sponsored