22EcoDs
Well-Known Member
For the record I went up to 27 average once it broke in. After 35s and lift I'm at 21.8Bone stock sport S 988 miles, 24.8 . I expect it to go up once it breaks in and summer fuel comes out.
Sponsored
For the record I went up to 27 average once it broke in. After 35s and lift I'm at 21.8Bone stock sport S 988 miles, 24.8 . I expect it to go up once it breaks in and summer fuel comes out.
Not diesel I suppose.40" tires on 4.88s.
14.7mpg.
And at what mileage do you think it was broken in?For the record I went up to 27 average once it broke in. After 35s and lift I'm at 21.8
I seen a drop in mpg at the end of Oct.And at what mileage do you think it was broken in?
Winter fuel must have hit me a couple tanks ago. I thought it was me drove in the deep snow. Maybe both. I'm currently down under 20 on 37s. I'm going to drive slow and shift early for a tank to see how high I can raise it again. In the winter. Thinking gde may be in store for Christmas.
Just after my first oil change actually at 4600 miles... Now I'm wondering if it was a combo of the factory fill and break in...And at what mileage do you think it was broken in?
Winter fuel must have hit me a couple tanks ago. I thought it was me drove in the deep snow. Maybe both. I'm currently down under 20 on 37s. I'm going to drive slow and shift early for a tank to see how high I can raise it again. In the winter. Thinking gde may be in store for Christmas.
Yes Diesel.Not diesel I suppose.
Hilarious, didn’t see any recent posts here claiming to be using fuel efficiency savings to recoup an “investment”. Maybe next time get a little more creative with your trolling.Reading through this thread I see two things.
1. You'll never recoup your investment from fuel savings on the diesel.
2. See 1
I get the torque side of it. But this thread is about mpg. I'm just saying that on that basis alone, compared to my gasser getting 18 on 2" lift and 35s, and weighing the added vehicle cost, higher fuel costs, and the DEF, it's not justifiable.Hilarious, didn’t see any recent posts here claiming to be using fuel efficiency savings to recoup an “investment”. Maybe next time get a little more creative with your trolling.
But MPGs are a moot point for most of us who got the Ecodiesel. We got it for torque and not to save on fuel economy. The impression I am getting from your post is that we got it to save on fuel cost and we are now disappointed that we'll not recover the extra cost we paid for the diesel engine. It's not the case.I get the torque side of it. But this thread is about mpg. I'm just saying that on that basis alone, compared to my gasser getting 18 on 2" lift and 35s, and weighing the added vehicle cost, higher fuel costs, and the DEF, it's not justifiable.
I attack EVs in the same straightforward and pragmatic manner. It's not personal.
Perhaps I misread the thread title ?But MPGs are a moot point for most of us who got the Ecodiesel. We got it for torque and not to save on fuel economy. The impression I am getting from your post is that we got it to save on fuel cost and we are now disappointed that we'll not recover the extra cost we paid for the diesel engine. It's not the case.
What does the thread title say?Perhaps I misread the thread title ?