WestwallNF104A
Well-Known Member
Yes, I think the technology is amazing. F1 used it to attain a thermal efficiency of nearly 50% in a period of two years. For those who can afford the very best it is, IMO the way to go.You say yourself that you "love hybrid vehicles" and you "wish" they met your needs and presumably you would have one if they did. Seems odd that you haven't considered that in spite of the conspiracies you may have seen online, EVs actually do meet many people's needs and that's the reason they buy them.
Can you think of (or find) any taxpayer-funded government actions or corporate welfare that, in your words, "punishes" EVs and subsidizes non-EVs by affecting either the initial or operating costs of non-EVs? Looking at it conversely, you (not I) could just as easily say that the only reason people are buying non-EVs is the government bailout of the auto makers and its financial and military support of the oil industry. Where do you think the money for that comes from?
And how does that make you feel emotionally vs. seeing on facebook that some people got a $7500 tax credit?
Hmm... when the government allows businesses to deduct 100% of the purchase price of vehicles above 6,000 lbs, are they mandating that businesses buy these large vehicles and are they unfairly "punishing" the sub-6,000 lb competition like smaller, more efficient cars that aren't eligible for a total deduction?
Did you take advantage of this handout?
The reality is that they failed. And you might be the only person here who feels that Jeeps are affordable for the average Joe these days! Unless maybe you're talking about a Compass.
If I had a million dollars, I would own a McLaren P1, no question. However, I don't. So I don't.
There's no conspiracy, there are government mandates to force people to buy EV's. California has declared no internal combustion engined vehicles will be allowed for sale after 2035 IIRC. That's not a conspiracy, that's a law, and as anyone with a brain knows as goes California, so goes the rest of the country.
I thought I laid out my reason for not having a hybrid is it lacks the payload I need for my business. That seems pretty straightforward.
Yeah, the federal government is allowing businesses to keep their money when they buy a vehicle for their business. Notice though that it's for large vehicles, mainly trucks. Trucks are used by businesses to make money, which is then taxed, so eventually the government still gets their money in the long run, they always do.
Once again, engineers are given a set of parameters. They design the vehicle to meet those parameters.
The fact that people don't want vehicles that are designed to those parameters isn't the fault of the engineers, it's the fault of those parameters, and those have, for the last 40 years been driven by government directives, mainly the asinine CAFE standards.
Sponsored